Commitment Towards Young Lawyers and Law Student Advancement

Sunday 23 April 2017

COURT PLACEMENT 2017: CONTEMPT OF COURT AND FILLING OF LOGBOOK





Contempt is defined generally to mean any act that tends to bring the court to disrepute, scorn or disrespect.
Before we proceed we want to wish all Nigerian Law School Students success in the next Phase of the Journey to Call to Bar; The Court Placement.
                                  
                               TIPS ON HOW TO FILL YOUR LOGBOOK
REMEMBER THE MOTTO:
‘’The Law school will not assist me not to participate in the externship program’’.

POSER: What Would I be doing in the Court?
Answer: Observe, discuss and reflect on activities in the Court.

THE FILLING OF THE LOG BOOK
1.      The Court and the division
2.      The Time the court sat
3.      The name of the Judge

FURTHERMORE,
4.      You should know the numbers of cases on the Cause List for the day, you can get that from the Court Clerk at the end of the day, because you must state the full particulars of the parties to the case you want to write on
5.     
       Kindly note what the Counsel and the Judge said during the case
6.       
    Note any argument in respect of what we have been taught in class

 N.B: More than one case might called for hearing or mention, if a particular case was more detailed and you understand it properly, you can emphasis more on it.

REFLECTION,
7.      What transpired in the court vis a viz the teachings in law school.
8.      From the cases you discussed, reflect on it with law school teachings.

N.B: DO NOT LIE!!!!!!

SO LET PROCEED TO CONTEMPT OF COURT



           LEGAL DEFINITION OF CONTEMPT: FRANKLIN ATEKE V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION & ANOR. (SUPRA), Idigbe, JSC said in defining contempt of Court:
“It is indeed difficult to give exact definition of contempt of Court and this is so because it is so manifold in its aspects but generally it may be described as any conduct which tends to bring into disrespect, scorn, or disrepute to the law or which tends to interfere with and or prejudice litigants and or witnesses in the course of litigation.”

FURTHERMORE, In A.G V MAGAZINE LTD contempt was also defined as;
            ‘’An Interference with the administration of Justice either in a particular case or more generally as a continuing process’’

POSER: WHY SHOULD THE COURT PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT?

1.      To preserve the Honor of the court
2.      To prevent undue interference with the administration of justice
3.      So as not to disregard the power and dignity of the judge as an individual
SEE; PARASHURAM DETARAM SHAMDASANI V KING EMPEROR

THE TYPES OF CONTEMPT
1.      Criminal
2.      Civil Contempt

CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

Meaning: This consists of words or acts which obstruct or tend to obstruct or interfere with the administration of justice.  For instance;
a)      To call a judge a liar or
b)      To allege that he is partial or
c)      To say in the course of the judgment “That is a most unjust remark”

CIVIL CONTEMPT

Meaning: This is contempt in procedure consisting of the disobedience to the Judge’s orders and other processes of Court and may involve personal injury.  For instance,
a)      Where a person is asked not to trespass on a property, if he does so, it is disobedience to the Court’s order and the injury is done to the Court’s integrity and private injury to the person concerned. See WOKOMA V WOKOMA

POSER: WHAT ARE THE ACTS THAT WOULD AMOUNT TO CONTEMPT?
Imagine while the case is on and Sis Suzzy is busy chewing gum in the court like the ‘’SISTERS OF THE NIGHT’’  or while Bro Dele and Bro Ade are busy discussing how Barcelona demolished Real Madrid and Suddenly Bro Ade shouted like the ‘’BROTHERS OF THE CAR PARK’’
Will these acts amount to Contempt? Think about it……

TAKE NOTE; It is not possible to particularize the act which can and cannot constitute contempt.  See AGBACHOM V. STATE (1970) 1 ALL NLR 69 AND it is not every act of discourtesy to the Court that amounts to contempt.  See UZUORA V. R. 13 WACA 313.

TAKE NOTE:  A breach by counsel of his duty to his client does not necessarily amount to contempt.  For example, if he fails to appear in Court on a hearing day. SEE IZUORA V QUEEN.

EXAMPLES OF CRIMINAL CONTEMPT
1.      Prejudicing a Fair Trail (Sub-judice rule)

a)      Making any comment concerning the case which is capable of affecting the outcome of the case one way or the other. R V GRIFFITHS
b)      Every private communication to a Judge on a matter before him, whether or not accompanied by the offer of a bribe, amounts to contempt as tending to interfere with the cause of Justice.  AWOBOKUN V. ADEYEMI;
c)      Publication in Newspaper misrepresenting court proceeding. See SECTION 133(4) CRIMINAL CODE

2.      Scandalizing The Court

a)      Calling a Judge a Liar
b)      Alleging that a Judge is partial
c)      To say in the course of the judgment “That is a most unjust remark”
d)     A letter accusing a Judge of Bias

3.      Interrupting Court Proceeding by Words or Conduct

a)      Whistling or Singing in the Court while the court is sitting
b)      Talking Loudly in Court
c)      Chewing gum loudly in court.

EXAMPLES OF CIVIL CONTEMPT
N.B: THIS IS ALSO KNOWN AS EITHER
a) Non-Criminal Contempt or
b) Contempt on Procedure
1)      Willful disobedience to Judgments or Court Orders
2)      Impeding Service of Court Process etc…..

POSER: HOW CAN CONTEMPT BE COMMITTED?
1.      In Facie Curiae (In the face of the Court
2.      Ex Facie Curiae (Outside the court

PROCEDURE FOR PUNISHMENT OF CONTEMPT
In AWOBOKUN V. ADEYEMI;
‘’ the contemnor phoned the judge and the following morning, the judge asked her to show cause why she should not be committed for contempt.  The Judge committed her for contempt and she appealed.  She got away with the contempt on appeal because the judge adopted a wrong procedure’’

So the question what is the RIGHT PROCEDURE?

N.B: The Procedure will depend on how the Contempt was committed.

HOWEVER, the question is HOW DO YOU PROVE A CONTEMPT OF COURT?

STANDARD OF PROOF: Proof beyond Reasonable Doubt.

WHY: Contempt is Quashi-Criminal Offense.

It is an established principle that it does not matter whether contempt is Criminal or Civil the standard of Proof is beyond reasonable doubt. SEE AWOBOKUN V ADEYEMI AND AMERICAN INT SECURITY & TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS (NIG) LTD V ELUGENE PETERSON & ANOR

THE PROCEDURE
Guiding Rule: No Person shall be punished for Contempt of Court which is a criminal offence unless the specific offence charged against him is distinctly stated and an opportunity of answering it given to him. OBIEKWE ANIWETA V THE STATE

CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

IN FACIE CURIAE
The Court can deal summarily with cases of contempt in the face of the Court and by the very judicial officer in whose presence the offence was committed but in cases of contempt not committed in the face of the Court, the Court has two options:

Option One (SUMMARY TRAIL)
There may be cases where the offence could be dealt with summarily but it must be in accordance with the cardinal principles of fair hearing and the case must be one in which the facts surrounding the alleged contempt are so notorious as to be virtually incontestable. The Contemnor is given adequate opportunity to defend himself. If the Contempt is proved, the Contemnor is convicted for contempt and sentenced.

Option Two (FULL PROSECUTION)
The proper procedure is the whole process of apprehension or arrest, charge, prosecution etc, in other words
a)      The Contemnor is arrested by the Police
b)      A charge will be drafted,
c)      the Contemnor is arraigned before another Judge not the Judge affected to take his plea
d)     He is prosecuted in full criminal trail
e)      Then, the Judge will give a Judgment

 In BOYO V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MIDWESTERN STATE (1971) 1 ALL NLR 342, the Supreme Court advised that;
Judges must be very careful in handling contempt cases because of the peculiar nature of the offence.  In a contempt case, the contemnor is usually reduced to such a state of humility in fear of more stern consequences that he is unable or willing to defend himself as he might otherwise have done.  It is for this reason that the standard of proof required in contempt cases is ‘proof beyond reasonable doubt.

IN EX FACIE CURIAE
These are criminal contempt committed outside the face of the court which is intended or likely to interfere or obstruct the administration of Justice.
The case has to be referred to another judge and the normal criminal procedure has to be followed.  See RE: DR. OLU ONAGORUWA (UNREPORTED) FCA/E/11779 of 5th February 1980.
Therefore, the option two stated above will also be followed.

CIVIL CONTEMPT
Generally, civil contempt are committed outside the face of the court. Contempt Ex Facie Curiae.

The Procedure
We have two options or ways available

Option One
The Party affected by the contempt would do any of the following;
a)      File a Motion to the court to have the Contemnor committed for contempt
b)      The motion is supported by Affidavit disclosing the grounds for the application
c)      The Motion will be heard; it is either granted or refused.

The party affected by the contempt may also do any of the following;
a)      File and Serve on the Contemnor FORM 48 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules; Sheriff and Civil Process Act
b)      Attach the enrolled order of court to it
c)      If he fails to comply with the order, FORM 49 would be served on the Contemnor
d)     The summon would be heard by the Court.

N.B: FORM 48: Notice of Consequences of Disobedience of Court Order
            FORM 49: Summons to Show cause why Contemnor should not be committed to prison for disobedience of court order

Option Two
The court can Suo Motu make an Order of committal of a person for civil Contempt

JURISDICTION OF COURT TO PUNISH FOR CONTEMPT
The High Court has inherent jurisdiction to punish criminal contempt summarily but the power should be exercised with the greatest caution. AWOBOKUN V ADEYEMI 

TAKE NOTE;
The inherent power to fine and imprison for contempt is not retained for the personal aggrandizement of a judge or whoever mans the Court.The powers are created, maintained, and retained for the purpose of preserving the dignity or honour of the Courts.  See Section 133 of the Criminal Code.  Section 133(4) of the Criminal Code provides thus:

“Any person who while a judicial proceeding is pending makes use of any speech or writing misrepresenting such proceedings or capable of prejudicing any person in favour of or against any party to such proceedings or calculated to lower the authority of any person before whom such proceedings is being heard or taken.”

FURTHERMORE,
Section 6 of the Criminal Code and it provides:

“Nothing in this law or in the Code shall affect the authority of the Courts of record to punish a person summarily for the offence commonly known as contempt of Courts.”

                                    PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT
GUIDING RULE:  A charge of Contempt is a very serious offence and in the spirit of protecting our Temple of Justice and not to bolster up the power and dignity of the judge as an individual. Any acts or conducts which tends to invade these concepts should be frown at and dealt with in a good time as well.

THE PUNISHMENT
1.      The Courts will pardon a contemnor whose conduct is unintentional and who purges his contempt by a sincere apology and credible explanation. OR his act is from a mistaken belief or misconception of the laws thereby flouting a court’s order. SEE THE STATE  HON JUSTICE A.A.M EKUNDAYO & ANOR

2.      Contempt committed in Under Section 133 of the Criminal Code carries a maximum sentence of three months.  See OKOMA V. UDOH (2002) 1 NWLR (PT. 748) 438

3.        For civil contempt, the punishment permissible by law is six months.  See AFE BABALOLA V. FEDECO

4.      The Court also has the power to order that a contemnor be kept in custody till he purges himself of the contempt.  See ATEKE’s case. 

       THANKS FOR READING PLEASE SHARE TO A FRIEND...........

0 comments:

Post a Comment